© 2024 WYPR
WYPR 88.1 FM Baltimore WYPF 88.1 FM Frederick WYPO 106.9 FM Ocean City
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Healthcare coverage from WYPR is made possible by support from GBMC HealthCare.

Baltimore rests its case in trial against opioid distributors

A sign to a McKesson location is shown in San Francisco, Tuesday, April 18, 2023. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)
Jeff Chiu
/
AP
A sign to a McKesson location is shown in San Francisco, Tuesday, April 18, 2023.

After a month of testimony, the city of Baltimore finished laying out its case for jurors as to why opioid distributors McKesson and Amerisource Bergen should be held accountable for damages to the city.

Attorneys for the city brought up Drug Enforcement Agency experts, city officials and showed depositions from top ranking executives in the companies.

McKesson and Amerisource are the only companies still standing after six companies, including Walgreens, Cardinal Health, CVS and others settled out of court.

The city’s lawyers led by Bill Carmody, a partner at Susman Godfrey, made the case to jurors in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City that the companies ignored warnings from the Drug Enforcement Agency that even one out-of-line pharmacy could pose huge dangers to the community.

The lawyers stated that the companies purposely did not report pharmacies that overfilled opioids and even worked with the pharmacies to skirt laws and fill the most prescriptions without raising red flags.

To that end, the city’s lawyers are alleging that the flood of opioid prescriptions, poorly regulated distribution and loose oversight hooked a disproportionate amount of Baltimoreans on the drugs and caused up to 80% of the opioid use disorder in the city.

That, the lawyers say, caused an influx in overdoses and a strain on city resources.

McKesson and Amerisource will now have an opportunity to bring up their own witnesses as they begin their defense.

The companies are claiming that they were purely the middlemen in the situation.

Amerisource’s lead lawyer Robert Nicholas, a partner at Reed Smith, said the city’s suit is purely about money and that the company complied with what the Drug Enforcement Agency asked.

The companies’ attorneys tried to pin the blame of the opioid epidemic on drug cartels and gangs for selling illegal drugs and on doctors for overprescribing legal opioids.

The lawyers claimed that the companies had no responsibility to decide if someone was in need of opioids or not, but rather it was the doctor who decided that.

The lawyers also stated that the Drug Enforcement Agency was notified of all drugs that were moved and therefore should have been more aware of issues.

In 2022, Nicholas successfully defended Amerisource in a case where West Virginia tried to tie distributors to the opioid crisis.

Scott is the Health Reporter for WYPR. @smaucionewypr
Related Content